<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AtP2: Working for the weekend</title>
	<link>http://positiveposition.com/blog/2006/02/19/working-for-the-weekend/</link>
	<description>A NEW and IMPROVED rant about the good, the bad, and the ugly in public relations.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Accentuate the Positive, 2.0 &#187; AtP2: Weekend, or a weak end?</title>
		<link>http://positiveposition.com/blog/2006/02/19/working-for-the-weekend/#comment-6412</link>
		<dc:creator>Accentuate the Positive, 2.0 &#187; AtP2: Weekend, or a weak end?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://positiveposition.com/blog/2006/02/19/working-for-the-weekend/#comment-6412</guid>
		<description>[...] For all of the talk of the 24-hour news cycle being &#8220;dead,&#8221; there certainly remains a strong 7-day cycle. A lot of old-school PR advice was centered around the notion of when to release the bad news for the minimum impact. As I&#8217;ve noted before, some specialized beats are too savvy for this practice, and it ought to be re-examined. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] For all of the talk of the 24-hour news cycle being &#8220;dead,&#8221; there certainly remains a strong 7-day cycle. A lot of old-school PR advice was centered around the notion of when to release the bad news for the minimum impact. As I&#8217;ve noted before, some specialized beats are too savvy for this practice, and it ought to be re-examined. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
